In the tumultuous world of football, absence from a match can lead to a maelstrom of speculation.

That was precisely the scene at the weekend when David Turnbull was notably absent from the squad against Kilmarnock.

This absence was made more conspicuous by the fact that he remained an unused substitute in the midweek clash against Lazio. Fans were left scratching their heads: What does this mean for Turnbull’s future at Celtic Park?

Brendan Rodgers has maintained a noticeable silence on any injury concerns surrounding Turnbull during press conferences. This has only stoked the fires of speculation.

With the 24-year-old’s contract set to expire in the summer, many are wondering if a departure is imminent. Come January, Turnbull is free to sign a pre-contract agreement, potentially leaving Celtic with empty hands, losing a top talent for nought.

Amidst this uncertainty, there’s been a flurry of activity elsewhere. Stars like Kyogo, Maeda, Hatate, O’Riley, Abada, Ralston, Welsh, and McGregor have all put pen to paper, committing their future to the Hoops. Even more, there are rumours about potential extensions for Carter-Vickers and Greg Taylor. Yet, Turnbull’s contract remains in limbo. No whispers, no hints. Why the silence?

While Turnbull has been a frequent feature in Rodgers’ game plan, the recent weeks have seen a marked change. The midfielder, with an impressive six league appearances this season and three goals to his name, suddenly finds himself out of the mainframe. Is this a mere tactical shift, or a sign of things to come?

With each passing week, as Turnbull’s contract situation remains unresolved, the Hoops must weigh the value of retaining the midfielder against the economic realities of the game.

The question remains: Is David Turnbull set for a Celtic exit? Time will tell, but until then, speculation will continue to reign supreme at Paradise.