During the half-time analysis of the Celtic versus Kilmarnock match, Kris Boyd’s evident frustration and bias became a focal point of discussion. Celtic took a 1-0 lead thanks to a Matt O’Riley goal, but Boyd fixated on a disputed penalty claim involving Kilmarnock.

Alistair Johnston’s impressive defensive block, which appeared to involve his back, was at the center of Boyd’s grievance. Boyd, noted for his often critical stance on Celtic-related decisions, was convinced the ball had struck Johnston’s arm, warranting a penalty.

Boyd’s conviction was evident in his heightened, high-pitched tone as he vehemently argued for a penalty based on his interpretation of the incident.

Chris Sutton, also part of the commentary team, provided a sharp counterpoint to Boyd’s claim, rinsing him in the process. Live on Sky Sports, Sutton addressed the imbalance in Boyd’s analysis, saying, “If you want a balanced opinion, which you clearly didn’t have at half time with one particular person.” This comment, aired on Sky Sports, directly critiqued the lack of objectivity in Boyd’s half-time commentary.

Sutton further elaborated by citing the rule relevant to handball incidents, stating, “A ball that hits the upper portion of a player’s hand should not be considered a handball. There we are, put that one to bed.” This clarification served to dismiss Boyd’s argument for a penalty.

The incident highlighted Boyd’s challenges in delivering unbiased punditry, especially in games involving Celtic. His inability to mask his bias and the palpable frustration he exhibits when Celtic is ahead was a striking aspect of his commentary, drawing criticism for its lack of professionalism.